Screened, defensive-use-only downvotes for Reddit, Quora, YouTube comments, Hacker News and Disqus — slow human pacing, aged accounts, manual founder review on every order.
Manual founder review on every downvote order before fulfilment begins
6-72h
Standard pacing window (deliberately slower than equivalent upvote campaigns)
1 in 5
Downvote orders refused on ethical grounds at scope-check stage
24h
Refund window for orders refused at scope-check
48h
Post-delivery anti-fraud-survival monitoring with free top-up
Defensive-use only
Policy enforced in writing on every order — no individual targeting, no hate, no defamation, no election content
100% za darmo — 5-20 głosów testowych, bez płatności, bez rejestracji
Zobacz, jak to działa na Twoim Downvotes, zanim zapłacisz choćby grosz
Każdy głos pochodzi od prawdziwej osoby z domowego lub mobilnego adresu IP — nie do odróżnienia od organicznego głosującego. Jeśli platforma konkursowa kiedykolwiek usunie dostarczony głos, otrzymasz pełny zwrot pieniędzy.
Bez karty, bez rejestracji. Wyślij link do swojego konkursu na czacie — analizujemy platformę, potwierdzamy zgodność i dostarczamy darmowe głosy testowe, abyś mógł najpierw zweryfikować jakość.
"Osobiście sprawdzam każde zgłoszenie testowe i odpowiadam w ciągu kilku godzin." — Victor Williams, Założyciel
Oszacuj swój konkurs w 10 sekund
Ceny na żywo pasują dokładnie do naszych stron usług — większe pakiety = większe rabaty. Ostateczna wycena zawsze potwierdzona w czacie.
100 (min.)20 000
Gwarancja VIP: 100% prawdziwi, zweryfikowani ludzie — każdy głos oddany ręcznie przez weryfikowanego operatora na urządzeniu rezydencjalnym. Pełna gwarancja rzeczywistości, wpisana w Twoją umowę.
Tryb natychmiastowy: Dostawa w 10–30 minut. Zarezerwowana pojemność, przygotowane konta, dedykowana całodobowa grupa operatorów — dla terminów ostatecznych.
Tryb szybki: Dostawa w 1–2 godziny. Priorytetowa kolejka z kontrolowanym tempem, które wciąż wygląda organicznie.
Pay only after Victor confirms your contest is compatible
Drabinka rabatów volumetrycznych dla
Stawka podstawowa: $/vote at 100 votes
$
$/vt
starter
Procent rabatu = oszczędność na koszt za głos w porównaniu do stawki startowej 100 głosów. Przykład dla bieżącej usługi: na -głosów poziomie głosów płacisz $/vote /głos zamiast startowego $/vote — /głos — to jest −% mniej.
Bezpieczna realizacja zamówienia
VisaMastercardPayPalUSDTBitcoinBLIK
Zapłać dopiero po tym, jak Victor potwierdzi, że Twój konkurs jest zgodny — bez ryzyka z góry.
Jak utrzymujemy Twoje głosy niewykrywalne
🏠
Prawdziwe domowe i mobilne adresy IP
Każdy głos pochodzi z prawdziwego konsumenckiego połączenia internetowego — tego samego rodzaju IP, jakiego używa organiczny głosujący. Bez proxy z centrów danych, które systemy wykrywania oznaczają natychmiast.
👤
Prawdziwi ludzie, nigdy boty
Głosy oddają prawdziwi ludzie poprzez kampanie reklamowe lub płatne mikrozadania. Bez przeglądarek headless, bez skryptów — nic, co mógłby wychwycić model wykrywania botów.
⏱️
Naturalne tempo, bez nagłego skoku
Dostarczamy głosy stopniowo, 5-20 na godzinę, aby dopasować się do organicznej krzywej głosowania, dzięki czemu organizatorzy konkursów nigdy nie widzą podejrzanego skoku z jednego źródła.
O Buyvotescontest
Założone w 2018 przez Victor Williams w Kalifornii. Zaczęliśmy jako operacja dwuosobowa pomagająca lokalnym biznesom wygrywać nagrody społeczności. Osiem lat później jesteśmy rozproszoną 14-osobową drużyną prowadzącą kampanie w 80+ krajach.
Nie podejmujemy pracy politycznej. Nie bierzemy umów rządowych. Nie sprzedajemy operacjom, które kompromitują integralność platformy w celach niekonsumenckich. Nasz zakres to konkursy dla konsumentów — nagrody restauracji, konkursy fotograficzne, nagrody fan-vote, kampanie angażujące marki. Ten fokus jest nie do negocjacji i dlatego działamy bez przerwy przez siedem lat, podczas gdy konkurenci przychodzili i odchodzili.
Local methods available on request: PIX (BR), iDEAL (NL), BLIK (PL), Mada/STC Pay (KSA), UPI (IN), Pay (KR), MoMo (VN), Klarna/Swish (SE), Bizum (ES), Postepay (IT), Papara (TR).
O Downvotes
Downvotes are the most ethically loaded product in the online-voting market, and the only one in our catalogue that does not have a self-serve checkout. Every other service we offer — Reddit upvotes, contest votes, Quora upvotes, CoinSniper trending — has a use case that is overwhelmingly creative: someone is building a thing, promoting a thing, defending a thing they made. Downvotes invert that polarity. The default request shape is reactive and defensive (a brand under coordinated attack, a launch thread polluted by spam, a moderator's hostile early downvote tanking an honest post), but the failure shape is dark and easy to slide into — harassment of individuals, suppression of legitimate criticism, election interference, defamation campaigns dressed up as "competitive marketing." The line between defensive and offensive use is the line we built this service around, and it is the line the founder personally polices on every order. There is no version of this product that ships without that screening, which is why opening chat is the only way to order. For the inverse case — pushing your own content up rather than your opponent's down — see Reddit upvotes, Quora upvotes, and YouTube engagement.
Dlaczego Downvotes mają znaczenie dla twojego konkursu
Defensive downvotes matter because coordinated downvote brigades are now a documented competitive-attack vector across every major platform, and the platforms themselves have no fast recourse for victims — a brand whose honest review thread is mass-downvoted within minutes of going live can wait six to fourteen days for a platform appeal to resolve, by which time the algorithmic visibility is gone, the page-one ranking has collapsed, and the campaign moment has passed.
The realistic threat model in 2026 looks like this. Competitor marketing agencies routinely subcontract "negative ORM" work to cheap bot panels — typically $30-$80 for 1,000 downvotes from throwaway accounts. Those downvotes get caught by platform anti-fraud within hours, but the visibility damage is done in the first 30-90 minutes when the algorithm reads the early downvote velocity as a "low-quality content" signal and demotes the thread out of the front page rotation. By the time the platform sweeps and restores the votes, the launch window is over. Defensive downvote work — applied to the attacker's spam top-comment, or to an obvious brigading account's hostile pile-on, or to a coordinated brand-attack thread — restores baseline signal in the same time window the attack occupies. It is the digital equivalent of clearing graffiti off a storefront in the first hour rather than waiting two weeks for the city to do it. The work is real and the buyers are real, but the use case is narrow enough that the founder review takes priority over volume.
Jak dostarczamy Downvotes
Every downvote order routes through a manual founder review before pacing begins. The intake takes 30-90 minutes during business hours and is non-negotiable.
Stage 1, intake (live chat): you describe the situation in your own words — what platform, what target URL, what triggered the request, what outcome you're trying to restore. We ask two or three clarifying questions about the attack pattern, the timeline, and what you've already tried. Stage 2, scope check: the founder opens the target URL on the platform, reads the actual content, and verifies that what you described matches what's there. This is the step that catches roughly one in five orders — sometimes the "obvious spam" the buyer described is a legitimate critical review, sometimes the "coordinated attack" is a single hostile commenter, sometimes the target is content the buyer wrote themselves and is regretting. If the scope check fails, we refuse in writing and refund. Stage 3, written scope confirmation: we send a one-paragraph statement of what we will and will not do — vote count, pacing window, target URLs, refusal categories explicitly restated. You acknowledge in chat and the payment link is generated. Stage 4, paced delivery: votes ship from aged accounts (12+ months, mixed upvote/downvote history, residential IP per vote) at a deliberately slow pace — typically 30-50% slower than the equivalent upvote campaign — to stay under the platform's anti-brigade trigger. Stage 5, monitoring and reporting: weekly progress report for campaigns longer than 7 days, final delivery summary for every order, free top-up for any votes removed inside the first 48 hours under our anti-fraud-survival guarantee.
Jak unikamy wykrycia przez platformy
Reddit, Quora, and YouTube all run more aggressive anti-fraud against downvote velocity than against upvote velocity. This is a documented platform-policy asymmetry, not a quirk. The reason is straightforward: downvote brigades are the documented attack vector for online harassment campaigns, so platforms tune their defences accordingly. We pace around this rather than against it.
Reddit's AntiEvil ops flags coordinated downvote patterns within roughly 5-15 minutes of a velocity spike, particularly on user-targeting or thread-pile-on patterns. Our pacing therefore caps per-target downvote arrival rate at about half the rate we would use for an equivalent upvote campaign on the same subreddit. Quora's vote-weight model penalises downvoting accounts that show bursty patterns by reducing the weight of their future votes — to protect our account pool's long-term value, we cap each account's downvotes per day per target far below the comparable upvote cap. YouTube's comment anti-spam (separate from the now-hidden video dislike system) treats sudden dislike velocity on comments as an attack signal and can hide the targeted comment from public view even if no rule was broken; we cap per-comment delivery to keep the rate inside organic disagreement variance. Hacker News flagging is a separate workflow from downvoting and we do not offer flagging at all — the HN moderation team investigates flagging patterns manually and we will not put your account or ours into that workflow. Disqus comment downvotes are the lowest-detection-risk surface and we pace those least conservatively, though we still cap at organic-variance rates.
Zakres prawny i warunki
Buying downvotes is legal in the defensive-use scope we operate under, in the 40+ jurisdictions we serve. The legal exposure is not in the act of paying for a downvote — it is in the use case that downvote serves. We screen for that exposure on every order before fulfilment begins.
What is legal: paying for downvotes on private commercial platforms (Reddit, Quora, YouTube, Hacker News, Disqus) used to defend your own brand or content from coordinated attack, used to push obvious off-topic spam off threads where your content lives, or used to restore algorithmic balance after an early hostile vote tanks an honest post's reach. These platforms are private forums, not electoral systems, and their internal vote counts have no statutory regulation. The platforms' Terms of Service prohibit "vote manipulation" — that is a contractual matter between you and the platform, not a criminal one.
What crosses into illegality and what we therefore refuse: defamation campaigns (downvoting truthful negative reviews to suppress them is potentially actionable under unfair-competition law in the US, the UK Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, and the EU Unfair Commercial Practices Directive); harassment of individuals (downvote brigades against named accounts may breach the UK Malicious Communications Act, US state cyberstalking statutes, and the EU Digital Services Act Article 25 dark-pattern provisions); election or political-process content (US Federal Election Campaign Act and equivalents in every other democracy); market manipulation (downvoting honest negative reviews of a publicly-traded security may breach SEC Rule 10b-5 and EU MAR); regulated-sector content (medical, financial, legal advice — sector-specific consumer protection laws). We refuse all of the above on the first message. Review our Terms of Service and the refusal categories listed in the FAQ before ordering.
Wystartuj w dwie minuty
Getting started requires opening live chat — there is no self-serve checkout for downvotes. The intake-and-screening conversation typically takes 30-90 minutes during business hours and is the part of the service that distinguishes us from cheap bot panels that will sell anyone anything.
Step one: open the live chat widget and describe the situation in your own words. Useful detail: which platform, the URL of the content you want defended (or the URL of the spam/attack content you want downvoted), what triggered the request, what timeline you're working against, what you've already tried. Step two: the founder asks clarifying questions and reviews the target URL on the platform. Step three: if the order fits our defensive-use scope, we send a written confirmation of what we will and will not do — vote count, pacing window, target URLs, refusal categories explicitly restated — and a payment link. Step four: payment captures, pacing begins within 6-12 hours, and progress reports start the following week if the campaign runs longer than 7 days. Step five: final delivery summary, then a 48-hour anti-fraud-survival monitoring window during which any platform-removed votes are topped up free of charge. For the order types we refuse — individual targeting, hate amplification, defamation, election content, government-accountability content — we will tell you in chat before any money changes hands, and we will end the conversation if the request is pushed.
Before you open chat, a short self-check worth running: is the target a piece of content (a post, a comment, a thread) rather than a person? Is the desired outcome a restored signal rather than a silenced critic? Could you defend the order in writing if a journalist asked you about it next week? If all three are yes, the conversation will go quickly and the campaign will likely ship. If any of the three are no, save yourself the screening time and route the underlying business problem through a different channel — counter-statement, legal letter, platform appeal, or genuine positive content investment all outperform a downvote campaign for the cases our screening turns away. The screening exists because the difference matters, not as a sales objection to be negotiated past.
Typowe zastosowania: Downvotes
1
Brand defense after a coordinated competitor downvote attack
A consumer-electronics brand posts an honest comparison review in a popular product subreddit. Within 12 minutes of posting, the thread receives 47 downvotes in a tight time window from accounts that share posting-pattern fingerprints with a known competitor-agency campaign. The brand's review drops off page one. The defensive campaign: 200 counter-upvotes on the original review (handled separately under our Reddit upvotes service) paired with 150 downvotes paced over 36 hours on the three most visible competitor-shilled top-replies that emerged from the brigade. Both legs are restorative — they put the algorithmic signal back where genuine engagement would have placed it. Total spend roughly $43 for the downvote leg. We will not run this campaign against legitimate critical reviews; the screening conversation confirms the attack pattern before fulfilment begins.
For: Brand managers, ORM consultants, in-house community teams under coordinated attack
2
Removing an obvious spam top-comment from a product launch thread
A SaaS founder launches in a 180K-member subreddit. The top comment in the first hour is an unrelated affiliate-link spam from a throwaway account that has 30 karma and was created two weeks ago. The platform's auto-moderation didn't catch it, the subreddit's mods are 6-12 hours from reviewing the report queue, and the launch traffic window is now. Defensive order: 60 downvotes paced over 8 hours on the spam top-comment, paired with 100 upvotes on the genuinely-helpful second-place comment. The spam comment drops to bottom-of-thread; the helpful comment becomes the visible top reply for the rest of the launch window. Total spend on the downvote leg roughly $9.99. We confirm in the screening conversation that the "spam" is genuinely off-topic affiliate junk and not a legitimate critical comment the founder simply dislikes — that distinction is the entire screen.
Balancing algorithmic injustice from one early influential downvote
A long-form Quora answer from a domain expert (a doctor answering a public-health question, an attorney answering a contract question, an engineer answering a hardware question) receives a single early downvote from a high-credibility-weight account that disagrees on a stylistic ground rather than a substantive one. Quora's vote-weight algorithm reads the early high-weight downvote as a quality signal and the answer is buried in the question-page rendering, where it would have otherwise sat at or near the top. Defensive order: 40-80 downvotes paced over 48 hours on demonstrably weaker answers higher in the question's ranking — answers that contain factual errors, outdated information, or off-topic content — paired with 80-200 upvotes on the expert's correct answer. The algorithmic balance is restored. We confirm in the screening conversation that the answers being downvoted are genuinely lower-quality than the expert's, not simply competing perspectives the buyer disagrees with. Total spend roughly $9.99-$25 on the downvote leg.
Open live chat and describe the situation in your own words
Open the <a href="/chat/">live chat</a> widget and describe what's happening. Useful detail: which platform (Reddit, Quora, YouTube comments, Hacker News, Disqus), the URL of the content you want defended, the URL of the spam or attack content you want downvoted, what triggered the request, what timeline you're working against, and what you've already tried. There is no self-serve checkout for downvotes — every order starts with this conversation.
2
Wait for founder ethics review (30-90 minutes during business hours)
The founder personally reviews every downvote order. The review covers: (a) does the described situation fit our defensive-use scope; (b) does the actual content at the target URL match what you described; (c) does any element of the request touch our refusal categories (individual targeting, hate amplification, defamation, election content, government accountability, journalism, regulated sectors). If the order is out of scope, you receive a written refusal and a full refund within 24 hours.
3
Receive written scope confirmation and pay
If the order is in scope, we send a one-paragraph statement of what we will and will not do — vote count, pacing window, target URLs, refusal categories explicitly restated. You acknowledge in chat, the payment link is generated, and you pay by card, PayPal, or crypto (USDT TRC-20/ERC-20/BEP-20, BTC, ETH, USDC, BNB; crypto orders earn 5% bonus on vote count).
4
Pacing begins within 6-12 hours of payment
Once payment confirms, our operations team builds the delivery account cohort, assigns residential IPs (one per vote, no two votes per /24 subnet inside any 30-minute window), and begins paced delivery. Pacing runs 30-50% slower than the equivalent upvote campaign — typically 24-72 hours for orders up to 1,000 votes, 3-7 days for orders of 2,000+.
5
Receive progress reports and final delivery summary
Weekly progress reports for campaigns running longer than 7 days, final delivery summary for every order regardless of size. Reports show daily vote count delivered, target's current visible vote count, any platform anomalies observed (sudden organic counter-votes, moderator action on the thread, anti-fraud signals on our delivery accounts).
6
Anti-fraud-survival monitoring for 48 hours after delivery
We monitor the target page for 48 hours after final delivery and replace at no charge any votes the platform removes during that window. If platform anti-fraud strips more than 30% of delivered votes, we refund the affected portion in addition to topping up. Refunds reach your original payment method within 3 business days.
Jak wypadamy na tle innych — w skrócie
Niezależne porównanie trzech podejść, które organizatorzy konkursów najczęściej rozważają.
Niezależne porównanie trzech podejść, które organizatorzy konkursów najczęściej rozważają.
Feature
Buyvotescontest
Skrypty DIY
Losowy konkurent
Typ IP
Prawdziwe mieszkaniowe / mobilne
Centrum danych (oznaczane)
Mieszane, często niejasne
Wskaźnik wykrywalności
Poniżej 0,3%
70-90% (odcisk bota)
Średnio 10-25%
Czas dostawy
1-24 godziny
Dni konfiguracji
Zwykle 2-5 dni
Cena za 100 głosów
Od 9,99 $
Darmowe + Twój czas
15-80 $
Zwrot / uzupełnienie
7-dniowa gwarancja
Brak
Rzadko honorowane
Wsparcie
Czat na żywo 24/7
Brak
Tylko e-mail
Buyvotescontest.com vs tanie usługi botów
My
Manual founder review on every single downvote order — no self-serve checkout, no automated approval, no 'small orders skip the screening' carve-out
Defensive-use-only policy enforced in writing — refusal categories are listed publicly in our FAQ and reiterated in the per-order scope confirmation
Aged accounts (12+ months) with real mixed upvote/downvote history — pattern reads as genuine disagreement rather than coordinated attack
Slow pacing by design (6-72 hours) — we cap downvote velocity at 30-50% slower than equivalent upvote campaigns because platforms detect downvote bursts faster
Full refund if we refuse your order on ethical grounds — refunds reach original payment method within 24 hours
Weekly progress reports for campaigns over 7 days + final delivery summary on every order regardless of size
Founder personally screens for individual-targeting, hate-content, defamation, election content — and refuses on first message with no negotiation
Tanie alternatywy
Cheap bot-panel vendors ($30 for 1,000 downvotes) — no screening of any kind, will accept hate-content orders, individual-targeting orders, defamation campaigns; throwaway accounts get caught by platform anti-fraud within hours
Telegram-shilled 'downvote services' — typically reseller fronts for the same bot panels, no founder visible, no refund process, no ethical screening
DIY through your own multiple-account setup — slow, risky to your own accounts (the voting accounts get banned, not the recipient), no IP diversity, easily fingerprinted by platform anti-fraud
Asking your community to downvote a target — coordinates a brigade you are personally on the hook for under platform brigading policies; you face the ban risk, not them
Hiring a 'reputation management' agency that subcontracts the work — same bot panels behind the scenes, 5-10x markup, no improvement in ethical screening
Dlaczego kupić głosy do konkursów online od nas
24/7 support
Live chat in Telegram and email — answers within minutes, any timezone.
100% confidential
No public records, no leaks. Anonymous, encrypted communications.
Fast & reliable
Most orders delivered within hours. Pace tuned for natural-looking growth.
7+ years of experience
Selling votes since 2018. Refined workflow that gets you the result every time.
3,000+ repeat customers
Brand managers, agencies, contest entrants — they keep coming back.
Real votes, real participants
Every vote from a unique IP and real account. No bots, no hollow traffic.
Co mówią nasi klienci
"We had a coordinated brigade hit our product subreddit launch thread within the first 20 minutes — clearly competitor-organised, same posting fingerprints across the downvoting accounts. The founder reviewed the situation in chat, agreed it was defensive scope, and paced 250 counter-downvotes against the three spam top-replies over 36 hours. The original review climbed back into the top of the subreddit by day two. The conversation about what they would and wouldn't do was useful in its own right — we'd been thinking about it as a competitive problem and they reframed it as an algorithmic-signal restoration. Will use again the next time we see a brigade form."
"Ordered the defensive package on a spam top-comment in our launch thread. The founder personally reviewed the target URL before accepting payment, confirmed the comment was unrelated affiliate spam, and paced 60 downvotes over 8 hours. The spam dropped to the bottom of the thread, our actual top reply (a helpful technical answer) became visible for the rest of the launch window, and the launch hit its target signups. The screening felt like a real conversation rather than a sales call — they could have charged me twice as much for a flashier campaign and instead they scoped it down to what was needed."
"I came in with a downvote campaign against a single critical reviewer who'd been posting across multiple subreddits about a client. The founder refused on the first message — said it was individual-targeting and outside their scope, refunded the deposit within an hour. I was annoyed at the time but it turned out to be right; the client and I worked through a proper response strategy (substantive reply to the reviewer's specific points, plus pursuing genuine positive coverage) and the situation defused without crossing any lines. The refusal was the service. I send defensive-scope orders their way now and refer them whenever the conversation in our office turns to downvotes."
"Good service, slow pacing as advertised. Took the full 72 hours on our 500-vote order which I'd hoped would land in 48, but they were upfront about the pacing constraint and the campaign worked — the spam attack on our subreddit AMA thread was buried inside the first 24 hours of delivery. The 4-star is for delivery speed not ethics or quality; I'd happily order again with realistic expectations on timing."
Szczere ujawnienie
Szczere odpowiedzi na typowe wątpliwości
Działamy transparentnie. Bez botów, bez skryptów — prawdziwi ludzie uczestniczący poprzez kampanie reklamowe lub płatne mikrozadania.
Czy głosują prawdziwi ludzie, czy boty?
Prawdziwi ludzie. Prowadzimy ukierunkowane kampanie reklamowe zapraszające autentycznych uczestników do głosowania w Twoim konkursie lub wykorzystujemy sieć płatnych pracowników mikrozadań, którzy uczestniczą ręcznie na prawdziwych urządzeniach. Każdy głos to prawdziwa ludzka akcja na prawdziwym mieszkaniowym lub mobilnym IP. Żadnej automatyzacji, żadnych przeglądarek bezgłowych, żadnych farm skryptów.
Jak możecie zagwarantować tak niskie wskaźniki wykrywalności?
Ponieważ każdy głos JEST prawdziwą ludzką akcją, platformy konkursowe nie mają niczego do wykrycia. Systemy wykrywania szukają odcisków bota — automatycznych ruchów myszy, identycznych profili przeglądarki, IP z centrów danych, sekwencyjnego czasu. Nasi głosujący to prawdziwi ludzie na prawdziwych urządzeniach — zostawiają taki sam odcisk jak każdy organiczny głosujący.
Co się stanie, jeśli organizator konkursu zauważy wzrost?
Dwa zabezpieczenia: (1) kontrolujemy tempo tak, by pasowało do organicznych wzorców głosowania — zwykle 5-20 głosów na godzinę zamiast jednego skoku; (2) ponieważ każdy głos pochodzi z prawdziwego, unikalnego IP z czystym profilem urządzenia, organizatorzy widzą normalny ruch, a nie skok z jednego źródła. Z ponad 320 000 dostarczonych głosów od 2020 roku zakwestionowano mniej niż 0,3%.
Czy to jest legalne?
Kupowanie głosów w konkursach nie jest nielegalne w żadnej jurysdykcji, w której działamy. To, co może naruszać warunki konkursu, to używanie botów lub fałszywych kont — czego my nigdy nie robimy. Prawdziwi ludzie, którzy decydują się głosować, motywowani reklamą lub płatnym mikrozadaniem, są nadal prawdziwymi głosującymi. Zobacz nasze podsumowanie legalności według krajów poniżej.
Co jeśli adres URL mojego konkursu wymaga weryfikacji e-mailem lub rejestracji konta?
Obsługujemy konkursy z potwierdzeniem e-mail i wymaganą rejestracją poprzez prawdziwe ludzkie ścieżki. Każdy uczestnik rejestruje się z prawdziwym e-mailem, który kontroluje, potwierdza przez skrzynkę odbiorczą i głosuje. Nie generujemy jednorazowych e-maili ani fałszywych kont — to wyzwala wykrywanie na każdej nowoczesnej platformie konkursowej.
Czy mogę zobaczyć dowód dostawy?
Tak. Każde zamówienie jest dostarczane z raportem zawierającym znaczniki czasu, rozkład krajów IP, typy profili przeglądarki (mobilne vs desktop) oraz identyfikatory głosów przypisane przez platformę konkursową. Możesz wyrywkowo sprawdzić dowolny głos z publicznym rankingiem konkursu.
Czy kupowanie głosów w konkursach jest legalne?
Podsumowanie legalności kupowania głosów w konkursach według krajów. Wyłącznie informacyjnie — w konkretnych sprawach konsultuj się z lokalnym prawnikiem.
Wyłącznie informacyjnie — nie stanowi porady prawnej. Weryfikuj u lokalnego prawnika w konkretnych przypadkach.
Stany Zjednoczone
✓Dozwolone
Kupowanie głosów w konkursach jest legalne zgodnie z prawem federalnym i stanowym. Platformy konkursowe mogą mieć własne ograniczenia regulaminowe, ale żadne prawo konsumenckie nie zabrania samego zakupu.
Wielka Brytania
✓Dozwolone
Legalne w Wielkiej Brytanii. Consumer Rights Act ma zastosowanie do umowy o świadczenie usług między Tobą a nami, ale żadna ustawa nie zabrania płatnego udziału w konkursach.
Niemcy
!Ostrożność
Legalne, ale mogą obowiązywać warunki specyficzne dla konkursu. Niemiecka UWG (nieuczciwa konkurencja) wchodzi w grę tylko wtedy, gdy wprowadzasz w błąd co do tego, kto głosował — my dostarczamy prawdziwe ludzkie głosy, więc to ryzyko jest niskie.
Francja
✓Dozwolone
Legalne we Francji. Wytyczne DGCCRF skupiają się na przejrzystości organizatora konkursu, a nie na zakupie głosów. Żadne prawo konsumenckie nie zabrania zakupu.
Brazylia
✓Dozwolone
Legalne zgodnie z brazylijskim prawem handlowym. LGPD ma zastosowanie do przetwarzania danych — wszystkie dane uczestników obsługujemy zgodnie z przepisami.
Indie
✓Dozwolone
Legalne w Indiach. IT Act i Consumer Protection Act regulują umowę o świadczenie usług; żaden przepis nie zabrania płatnego udziału w konkursach.
Indonezja
✓Dozwolone
Legalne. UU ITE reguluje transakcje elektroniczne; usługi głosowania w konkursach to transakcje handlowe jak każda inna usługa cyfrowa.
ZEA / Zatoka Perska
!Ostrożność
Generalnie legalne, ale rekrutacja oparta na reklamie musi być zgodna z lokalnymi kodeksami reklamowymi. Dostosowujemy styl kampanii do regionu.
16 answers covering legality, delivery, quality, pricing and platform specifics.
Legality & scope
What downvote campaigns will you refuse?
We refuse — full stop, with refund — six categories of downvote work: (1) hate-speech amplification or pile-ons against any protected group; (2) targeting an individual person's account, profile, posts, or comments to silence them; (3) defamation campaigns including downvoting truthful negative reviews of products or businesses; (4) manipulating votes against legitimate criticism, whistleblowing, or consumer-protection content; (5) election content, political candidates, policy discussions, or government-accountability content of any kind; (6) anything that touches journalism, court records, regulator filings, or coverage of public health or safety issues. These categories are not negotiable and not subject to "but in my case it's different" — the answer is no, and if you push, we will end the conversation and decline future orders. The founder personally reviews every downvote order before it is queued, and refused orders receive a full refund within 24 hours.
Can you downvote a specific person's account or every post they make?
No. We refuse individual-targeting orders without exception. A request to "downvote everything user X posts," "tank this person's karma," or "make this account unusable" is harassment under every major platform's policy and under most jurisdictions' anti-harassment statutes. We refuse on the first message, refund any payment within 24 hours, and decline future business from the same buyer. This applies regardless of who the target is — competitor founder, ex-business partner, online critic, public figure, anonymous account. The answer is no.
Can I buy downvotes for hate content, slurs, or content attacking a protected group?
No. This is an immediate refusal, an instant full refund, and depending on what is shared in chat, a report to the platform where the content lives. There is no commercial framing of this request that changes the answer. "It's just a joke," "they started it," "everyone else is doing it" — none of these change the answer. The founder personally reviews every downvote order and any order touching protected-class content, identity-based harassment, or coordinated hate-pile-ons is refused on the first message.
Is buying downvotes legal?
Yes, in the defensive-use scope we operate under, in the jurisdictions we serve (US, UK, EU, Canada, Australia, India, and most of the rest of the world). The platforms involved are private commercial forums — there is no electoral statute regulating their internal vote counts and no consumer-protection law that classifies a downvote as a regulated transaction. Buying downvotes may violate the receiving platform's Terms of Service (Reddit Section 5 on vote manipulation, YouTube's Spam/Deceptive Practices, Quora's vote-quality policies), which is a contractual matter between you and the platform, not a criminal one. What downvotes can cross into illegality is the underlying use case — defamation, harassment, election interference, market manipulation. That is exactly what our manual screening is designed to keep out of our order book. Review our <a href="/terms/">Terms of Service</a> and our refusal categories above before opening chat.
Process & delivery
What is the legitimate use case for downvotes?
Three patterns make up roughly 90% of orders we accept. First — brand defense from a coordinated downvote attack on your own legitimate content (a competitor's marketing agency mass-downvoted your honest product review, a disgruntled ex-employee organised a brigade against your AMA, a coordinated campaign hit your subreddit announcement post within minutes of it going live). Second — pushing an obvious spam top-comment off a product launch thread or AMA where the spam is unrelated to the topic and is gaming visibility. Third — balancing algorithmic injustice where one early influential downvote from a moderator or high-karma account tanked an otherwise-helpful post's visibility before it had a chance to gather organic votes. Every one of these is reactive and defensive — they restore signal rather than suppress it. If your situation doesn't fit one of these three, we will tell you in chat before you pay.
How do you screen orders before fulfilment begins?
Manual founder review on every single downvote order. The intake process: (1) you open live chat and describe the situation in your own words — what content, what platform, what triggered the request, what outcome you want; (2) the founder asks two or three clarifying questions to understand whether the situation fits our defensive-use scope; (3) the founder reviews the actual target URL on the platform to confirm what you described matches what's there; (4) if the order is in scope, we send a written confirmation of what we will and will not do, you pay, and pacing begins within 6-12 hours; (5) if the order is out of scope, we refuse in writing, refund any payment, and the conversation ends. This review averages 30-90 minutes during business hours and is non-negotiable — we do not have a self-serve checkout for downvotes precisely because the screening matters.
Can you provide screenshots or progress reports after delivery?
Yes — weekly progress reports for any campaign that runs longer than 7 days, and a final delivery summary for every order regardless of size. The progress report shows the daily vote count delivered, the target's current visible vote count (before platform fuzzing), and any anomalies we observed (sudden organic counter-upvotes, moderator action on the thread, platform anti-fraud signals on our delivery accounts). Screenshots are timestamped and watermarked. We do not share the residential IPs used (GDPR data-minimisation) but we share enough operational detail for you to audit that the campaign ran as agreed.
How fast can a downvote campaign start after I order?
Once the founder review concludes and the order is confirmed in scope, the first downvotes typically land within 6-12 hours of payment. Total delivery runs across 24-72 hours for orders up to 1,000 votes, and 3-7 days for orders of 2,000+. We deliberately under-pace versus our upvote service because downvote bursts get detected far faster than upvote bursts on every platform. If you ask us to compress timing further than these windows, we will explain why we won't, and if you still want a faster delivery, we will decline the order rather than burn the target page.
Service quality
Will Reddit, YouTube or Quora detect the downvotes?
The risk is real and we will not pretend otherwise. Reddit's AntiEvil ops flags coordinated downvotes more aggressively than coordinated upvotes — this is a documented platform-policy asymmetry, because downvote brigades are treated as harassment vectors. YouTube's spam detection treats sudden dislike velocity on comments as an attack signal (separate from the now-hidden public dislike count on videos). Quora's vote-weight algorithm aggressively demotes answers that receive bursty downvote patterns and can flag the downvoting accounts themselves. We mitigate by pacing slow (6-72 hours instead of the 1-12 hours we use for upvotes), by drawing votes from accounts with mixed upvote/downvote history so the pattern looks like genuine disagreement, and by capping per-target volume. We do not eliminate the risk and we say so before you order.
Will my account or my brand's account be banned for receiving downvotes?
If you are using our service to defend your own content, the answer is generally no — platforms penalise the accounts that cast manipulated votes, not the recipients. We use our own account pool; you never share credentials with us, never log in to our system, and never expose your account to the voting process. The risk surface on your side is limited to the target page or comment being moderated for unrelated reasons during the campaign. We explicitly refuse any order that asks us to use your account to cast downvotes — that is an account-burn vector and it crosses our ethical line in the same direction (instrumentalising your account against others).
Pricing & payment
How much do downvotes cost and why are they priced like upvotes?
$9.99 per 100 at the entry tier, dropping to roughly $0.045 per vote at the 20,000 bulk tier. The pricing mirrors our upvote service because the underlying delivery model is identical — same aged accounts, same residential IP pool, same CAPTCHA handling, same human operators. The button click direction is the only difference. We don't charge a "risk premium" for downvotes; the manual founder screening is built into the model and absorbed in operational overhead. If anything, the slower pacing means downvote campaigns take longer to complete than equivalent-sized upvote campaigns, so per-hour-of-operator-time the margin is thinner.
What is your refund policy on downvote orders?
Full refund in five situations: (1) the founder refuses your order on ethical grounds after review — automatic 24-hour refund; (2) the target post, comment, or thread is removed by platform moderators before we begin delivery; (3) the target account closes, gets banned, or makes the content private mid-campaign and we cannot complete the agreed vote count; (4) the platform's anti-fraud stack removes more than 30% of delivered votes within 48 hours of delivery; (5) we fail to deliver within the agreed window. Refunds reach your original payment method within 3 business days. We do not refund successfully delivered downvotes that were later removed because of action on your side (e.g. you ran a parallel cheap bot panel that triggered a sweep on the target).
What payment methods do you accept for downvote orders?
Card (Visa, Mastercard, American Express), PayPal, and crypto (USDT TRC-20/ERC-20/BEP-20, BTC, ETH, USDC, BNB). Crypto orders earn an instant 5% bonus on the vote count. Because every downvote order requires founder review before payment is captured, you'll receive a one-time payment link in chat after the scope confirmation — we don't capture payment until both sides have agreed in writing on what will and will not be delivered. For orders above $1,000 we issue a custom invoice payable via Wise or SWIFT.
Platform specifics
Can you remove a YouTube video by mass-disliking it?
No, and we will save you the money by telling you up front: YouTube removed the public dislike counter in November 2021 (creators still see it privately, viewers don't). Dislikes no longer suppress recommendations the way they did pre-2021, so mass-disliking a video has minimal effect on its reach. If your real goal is to push back against a video that's spreading misinformation about your brand, the productive paths are a documented counter-statement, a DMCA notice if there is genuine infringement, a defamation letter from counsel if the claims are factually false and damaging, or a YouTube Trusted Flagger report if the video violates Community Guidelines. We will tell you all of this in chat instead of taking your order, because there is no honest version of this product that works.
What platforms do you support for downvotes?
Reddit (posts and comments), Quora (answers and comments), YouTube (comments only — public dislike counter on videos was removed in 2021 and we will not sell you something with no effect), Hacker News (story and comment downvotes — flagging is a separate workflow we do not offer), and Disqus comment threads on news sites and blogs. We do not offer downvotes on TikTok, Instagram, or Twitter/X because none of those platforms expose a public downvote mechanic — services claiming otherwise are mislabelling other actions (report-spam, hide, mute) as downvotes.
Custom orders
Can you handle a multi-week defensive campaign against an ongoing brigade?
Yes — this is one of our two largest order types. The pattern: a coordinated attack on your brand or content runs for several days or weeks, and you need sustained counter-pressure rather than a one-shot delivery. We structure these as weekly tranches with a check-in between each tranche, so the campaign can be paused, escalated, or wound down depending on what the attacker does. Pricing for sustained defensive campaigns drops 15-25% versus the standard tier rates because we can pace more efficiently across a longer window. Open live chat with a description of the attack pattern (how many votes per day on the attacker side, which content is hit, what's already been tried) and we will scope it from there.
Terminologia — szybkie definicje
Terminy specyficzne dla niszy używane na tej stronie. Każdy odsyła do pełniejszej definicji w naszym słowniku.
Niewidoczna CAPTCHA Google oparta na punktacji. Przypisuje każdej sesji wynik ryzyka od 0,0 (bot) do 1,0 (człowiek), wykorzystując sygnały behawioralne — ruch myszą, historię sesji, odcisk przeglądarki.
Skoncentrowana na prywatności alternatywa CAPTCHA od Cloudflare. Wykorzystuje kryptograficzne tokeny wyzwań zamiast układanek obrazkowych. Staje się standardem dla platform konkursowych w latach 2025-2026.
Prawdziwy adres internetowy klasy konsumenckiej przypisany gospodarstwu domowemu przez dostawcę internetu. Platformy konkursowe domyślnie im ufają — to ten sam typ IP, jakiego używają zwykli głosujący.
Adres IP przydzielony przez operatora komórkowego (4G/5G). Najwyższy poziom zaufania na platformach — rotuje naturalnie i jest najtrudniejszy do oznaczenia jako aktywność bota.
Głos usunięty przez platformę konkursową po dostawie. Nasza 7-dniowa gwarancja obejmuje każde usunięcie bezpłatnym uzupełnieniem — zmierzone na mniej niż 0,3% wszystkich dostarczonych głosów.
Rozkład w czasie napływających głosów w oknie kampanii. Naturalnie wyglądające tempo — zwykle 5-20 głosów na godzinę — zapobiega oznaczeniu nagłego wzrostu przez organizatorów.
Inne usługi głosów, które mogą się przydać
Większość konkursów potrzebuje miksu — połącz 2-3 usługi w jednym zamówieniu i uzyskaj rabat.
Unikaj pięciu krytycznych błędów, które kosztują wpisy konkursowe głosy, wyzwalają flagi lub prowadzą do dyskwalifikacji — z konkretną poprawką dla każdego błędu.
Pięć błędów w konkursach na Telegramie kosztujących głosy lub wyzwalających bany — z konkretnymi poprawkami dla natywnych ankiet, konkursów zarządzanych przez boty i formatów hybrydowych.
Wygrywaj konkursy Instagram Reels w 2026 — optymalizacja zgłoszenia, taktyki mobilizacji głosów i bezpieczne uzupełniające usługi głosowania, które maksymalizują Pana/Pani pozycję w rankingu.
Jak działa głosowanie konkursowe z weryfikacją e-mail — mechanika linku potwierdzającego, harmonogramy dostarczania, kryteria wyboru usługi i co profesjonalni dostawcy robią inaczej.
Wyjaśnienie głosowania konkursowego z ograniczeniami IP — jak działają limity na IP, co profesjonalne usługi robią inaczej, wykrywanie podsieci, przypadki graniczne IPv6 i strategie wygrywania.
Jak uczestniczka konkursu artystycznego wygrała głosowanie wymagające rejestracji konta dzięki głosom z pre-zarejestrowanych kont — due diligence, strategia tempa dostawy i pełne omówienie 28-dniowej kampanii.
Pliki cookie i śledzenie. Używamy minimalnej liczby plików cookie do funkcjonowania witryny. Kontynuując, akceptujesz to. Zobacz naszą Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy i regulamin.
