IP Rotation for Contest Votes: Ultimate 2026 Buyer's Guide
How IP rotation works for contest votes — proxy quality tiers, rotation strategies, provider vetting criteria, delivery failure diagnosis, and 2026 pricing benchmarks.
Read more →The High School on SI / SBLive weekly fan vote for Alabama's top girls basketball performance. Editors set the nominees, fans vote freely with the poll's own published rule — "as often as you wish" — and the ballot closes Sunday night at 11:59 p.m. Pacific.
Disclosure: buyvotescontest.com is a vote-promotion service. This is independent, informational coverage of a public contest run by a third party; we are not affiliated with the organizer. Where our own services are relevant they are clearly labeled, and the contest's official rules always take precedence.
Start with the confirmed result. Reece Davis of Deshler won the Alabama Girls Basketball Player of the Week for the period covering January 5–11, 2025: 30 points on 58% shooting in one game, 27 points on 52% shooting in the next. Then she showed up on the very next ballot — the January 21 poll — alongside seven different nominees competing for the same award.
That sequence is worth unpacking. SI's Alabama editors put her back in the field the following week because her play kept earning it. But for anyone trying to understand how this poll works, the more important data point is the January 14 nominee list itself. Eight players. Stat lines ranging from Samarian Franklin's 40-point, 61%-FG, 10-assist line for Wenonah all the way to Hadlee Sanderson's three-game stretch of 35 total rebounds for Brilliant. A Mississippi State commit (Lani Smallwood, Susan Moore) posting 45 points and 24 rebounds over two games. And Reece Davis won.
She won because Deshler's community turned out. The stat lines do not determine the winner here — they determine the nominees. What happens after the article goes live is entirely about which school's supporters find the link, share it, and keep voting through Sunday night. Davis's numbers were strong but not the highest on the ballot. That is not an asterisk; that is the design of a fan vote.
The 2025 poll covering games January 5–11 is the richest confirmed ballot on record for this award. Eight nominees, eight different schools, and stat lines detailed enough to compare properly:
| Nominee | School | Key stats (that week) |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah Davis | Shoals Christian | 39 pts, 18 reb, 8 blk vs Waterloo; 23 pts, 11 reb vs Cherokee |
| Reece Davis | Deshler | 30 pts / 58% FG; 27 pts / 52% FG — winner |
| Queen Ballard | Central of Coosa Co. | 20 pts, 31 reb vs Dadeville; 16 pts, 22 reb vs Childersburg |
| Samarian Franklin | Wenonah | 40 pts / 61% FG, 6 reb, 10 ast, 6 stl |
| Hadlee Sanderson | Brilliant | 21 ppg, 35 reb, 7 ast — three games |
| Lexie Smith | Edgewood Academy | 37 pts, 4 reb, 4 ast, 3 stl, 1 blk |
| Lani Smallwood | Susan Moore | 45 pts, 24 reb — two games; Mississippi State commit |
| Madi-Marie Grayson | Bryant | 26 pts vs Baker; 17 pts vs Davidson |
Look at what the table does not tell you: which school is in which AHSAA classification, and whether that matters here. It does not. Queen Ballard's 31-rebound game for Central of Coosa County — a small program in Rockford — sits next to Lani Smallwood's 45-point outing for Susan Moore. Both earned nominations. On a fan ballot, a school in a small county competing against a Mississippi State commit's program is not an upset waiting to happen — it is Wednesday through Sunday, depending on which community moves faster.
Sarah Davis's raw numbers might look like the week's standout (39 points, 18 rebounds, and 8 blocks in a single game is unusual by any measure), but Davis did not win. The ballot is not a stat-sorting exercise. Knowing that is the single most useful thing before you plan a campaign around any nominee in this field.
The organizer's published language for this poll: "You can vote as often as you wish and are encouraged to share our polls with others." That is worth stating once, precisely, because it is different from what you might assume if you have seen Alabama's multi-sport Athlete of the Week poll. That poll limits voting to one per 6 hours per device — an explicit cap, stated verbatim. This girls basketball poll has no such limit.
The practical consequence is that a supporter who comes back to the article five times between Thursday and Sunday is casting five real votes, not getting blocked or throttled. Sharing the link into a group chat where 40 people each vote a few times across the week is more effective than any one person grinding through the same phone. The ballot rewards breadth — how many people you reach — over any single voter's persistence.
And the close time is Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific. The last push Sunday afternoon and evening, when many people have already assumed the week is over, runs into a field where casual voting has thinned out. That window has decided close polls before in this format.
Spring Garden, in Cherokee County, has won three consecutive AHSAA state championships and produced Ace Austin, an Alabama signee. That program's name does not appear in the two confirmed January 2025 polls. Neither does Mountain Brook, which holds 35 all-time girls basketball titles in Alabama — more than any other program in the state. What that tells you is that the SI ballot tracks recent weekly performance, not program reputation. A school with 35 titles can be absent from a given week's list if it did not have the loudest stat line that week.
The schools that do appear are spread across the state in ways the football polls rarely are. Shoals Christian is in the Muscle Shoals area in the northwest. Brilliant is in Marion County. Wenonah draws from Birmingham. Central of Coosa County is in Rockford, a town of about 800 people. Deshler — whose Reece Davis won — is in Tuscumbia, in the Tennessee Valley, in a community where girls basketball has been consistent enough to produce back-to-back nominations for the same player.
That geographic spread is a real strategic variable. A school in Tuscumbia running a campaign is working a different network than a school in Rockford or Birmingham. Distance from the metro area does not hurt in a fan poll the way it might in other contexts — a tight-knit Colbert County community that routes a link through its own channels can move faster than a larger urban program where the poll link has to clear more layers before it converts into a vote. For a vote campaign, the starting point is knowing which type of community you are in. The weekly fan-vote how-to guide covers the mechanics that apply to open, uncapped polls like this one.
For more Alabama fan-vote contests, the full state directory is at /usa/alabama/. The national index of weekly high school sports polls is at /usa/.
The poll is embedded inside a dated article at si.com/high-school/alabama/girls-basketball — not on a standalone page. Each week a new article goes up after the weekend's games. Check the publish date before voting; old poll articles stay live and their widgets can still accept submissions, so you want the newest one.
SI lists each nominee with the performances that earned the nod: points per game, shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, or opponent details. Those lines are the only public breakdown of the field, and reading them takes about 90 seconds — worth doing before you commit your first vote.
Tap your nominee in the embedded widget. The organizer's published language is explicit: "You can vote as often as you wish and are encouraged to share our polls with others." There is no per-hour or per-device limit. Every additional visit before Sunday night counts.
The poll closes Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific. Unlike the statewide Alabama multi-sport Athlete of the Week poll — which caps voting to one per 6 hours — this sport-specific basketball poll is fully open. The last hours Sunday, when casual interest drifts elsewhere, belong to whoever is still moving the link.
14 answers covering legality, delivery, quality, pricing and platform specifics.
Last reviewed June 2026. Contest dates, rules and vote caps change each season — always confirm the current rules on the official contest page before you vote.
Practical guides, technical deep-dives, and anonymized case studies.60+ articles. Selection rotates.
How IP rotation works for contest votes — proxy quality tiers, rotation strategies, provider vetting criteria, delivery failure diagnosis, and 2026 pricing benchmarks.
Read more →
Twitter/X poll contest mechanics, vote acquisition services, safety protocols, and a proven campaign timeline — everything serious entrants need for 2026.
Read more →
How sign-up required contest voting works — registration gates, aged account infrastructure, provider quality signals, and how to plan your campaign budget.
Read more →
Step-by-step playbook for winning Facebook photo contests in 2026 — vote-boosting strategy, safe promotion, and the critical 48-hour sprint.
Read more →
Avoid five critical errors that cost Facebook contest entries votes, trigger flags, or lead to disqualification — with a concrete fix for each mistake.
Read more →
How a community arts organization used a structured two-tranche vote strategy to win an email-verified $25,000 grant contest — with campaign decisions documented.
Read more →
Hi 👋 — drop your contest URL and I'll send a price quote within an hour. No card needed yet.