UK Facebook Contest Voters: Pricing, Behavior & Targeting 2026
Source UK-based Facebook contest votes with confidence — 2026 pricing tiers, geo-targeting signals, account quality benchmarks, and buyer guidance.
Read more →Annual statewide readers-choice awards from Kentucky Living magazine (Kentucky Association of Electric Cooperatives), with open nominations followed by public voting each May at KentuckyLiving.com.
Disclosure: buyvotescontest.com is a vote-promotion service. This is independent, informational coverage of a public contest run by a third party; we are not affiliated with the organizer. Where our own services are relevant they are clearly labeled, and the contest's official rules always take precedence.
Best in Kentucky is a statewide readers-choice award run by Kentucky Living magazine, part of the Kentucky Association of Electric Cooperatives, reaching over 1 million readers a month. Nominations open in February; the public vote runs May 1-31 at KentuckyLiving.com across roughly 30 categories.
No other Kentucky best-of program works at that scale. Louisville has its own city best-of polls. So does Lexington. Best in Kentucky skips the metro layer entirely and puts a Paducah hardware store on the same ballot as a Louisville restaurant chain. That's the entire structural story of this contest, and it's why a Frankfort insurance agency and a Bowling Green bakery can both call themselves finalists in the same year without ever competing against each other's actual customers.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Program name | Best in Kentucky |
| Publisher | Kentucky Living magazine (Kentucky Association of Electric Cooperatives) |
| Official site | KentuckyLiving.com |
| Geographic scope | Statewide Kentucky |
| Readership | Over 1 million readers per month |
| Program age | 16th year as of the 2025 cycle |
| Category count | Roughly 30 categories |
| Nomination window | Opens in February |
| Public voting window | May 1-31 |
What this page won't do is guess. Kentucky Living doesn't publish a searchable winners archive going back through all 16 cycles, and old PDFs floating around from prior years aren't a safe source for a current claim. See the Kentucky contest hub for how this program compares with the state's other fan-vote and readers-choice programs.
Here's what's missing: a confirmed, category-by-category winners list. Kentucky Living publishes results after the May vote closes, but there's no central archive a business can search by year. That gap is exactly why vague "Kentucky's best" marketing claims spread, and exactly why they're risky.
A business picks its category during the nomination window, and that choice sticks through the whole cycle. Choosing "restaurants" instead of a narrower food subcategory can bury a niche caterer among city-scale chains. The stronger move is the category where existing customers recognize the business instantly, not the broadest label available.
| Category area | Confirmed scope | Campaign note |
|---|---|---|
| Food and dining | Part of the roughly 30 confirmed category groups. | Match the exact official subcategory label from the live ballot in every reminder. |
| Retail and shopping | Part of the confirmed category structure. | In-store signage and QR codes cut voting friction at the point of sale. |
| Services | Part of the confirmed category structure. | A customer email list usually outperforms a broad social post here. |
| Community and local life | Kentucky Living covers community-oriented categories alongside business ones. | Community groups can drive nominations, provided outreach stays rule-compliant. |
The live ballot at KentuckyLiving.com is the only source for the current full category list; subcategory names shift year to year, so this page doesn't invent labels beyond what's confirmed. Restaurants weighing the food and dining category specifically can also review restaurant vote campaign guidance, and any business planning a broader award push should see best business award voting.
Two stages, five months apart. Open nominations start in February. Public voting runs May 1-31. Miss February, and there's no May ballot to campaign for, regardless of loyal the customer base.
| Stage | Typical window | What a business should do |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-nomination setup | Before February | Lock in the most accurate category and standardize the business name everywhere. |
| Open nominations | February onward | Ask real customers, staff, and community supporters to nominate the business in the right category. |
| Finalist selection | Between nominations and May | Top nominees advance to the May public ballot, per the program's stated structure. |
| Public voting | May 1-31 | Send reminders that track the current ballot rules for that cycle, not last year's. |
| Results and promotion | After Kentucky Living publishes results | Use "winner" or "finalist" language only for the exact year and category confirmed. |
A nominate-then-vote structure like this rewards businesses that plan a full quarter ahead. It punishes the ones that treat May like the whole contest. Similar nomination-then-vote calendars show up across award-style vote campaigns generally, so the discipline transfers even outside Kentucky.
Award name. Category. Business name. Where to vote. That's the whole message, and anything longer tends to lose people mid-scroll.
Kentucky Living's audience is statewide and mostly reading for community and lifestyle content, not hunting for a specific ballot. A cluttered, hype-heavy reminder competes badly against that reading mode. A plain one, sent more than once, works better across a month-long window than a single big push does.
Three touches tend to cover it: a launch message when voting opens May 1, a mid-month nudge, and a tighter final call in the last week. Businesses serving several counties can split the message by region while keeping the actual voting instruction word-for-word identical. General real-voter campaign guidance covers the mechanics of pairing paid reach with organic reminders, useful before the May window opens, not during the final scramble.
"Statewide" describes the ballot, not the voters. A Paducah business and a Covington business share a contest but not a customer base, and that distinction is the whole outreach strategy in one sentence.
| City / region | Likely campaign use | Message angle |
|---|---|---|
| Louisville | Restaurants, retail, health, home, and professional service networks in the state's largest metro. | Category clarity matters more given the size of the local audience. |
| Lexington | Food, services, retail, and community-oriented businesses. | Pair customer email lists with social reminders. |
| Bowling Green | South Central Kentucky retail, food, and home-service audiences. | In-store signage plus staff reminders works well here. |
| Owensboro | Western Kentucky food, retail, and service networks. | Community and referral networks tend to drive nominations. |
| Covington | Northern Kentucky food, retail, and professional service audiences. | Regional identity can sit alongside the statewide Kentucky Living framing. |
| Frankfort | State-capital business and civic-adjacent service audiences. | Keep category and business-name instructions simple. |
| Paducah | Western Kentucky / Jackson Purchase retail and service networks. | Community loyalty tends to drive steady nomination volume. |
| Hopkinsville | Christian County retail and service audiences. | Local business networks usually beat broad social posts. |
| Pikeville | Eastern Kentucky / Appalachian region businesses. | Community trust and word-of-mouth carry real weight here. |
| Somerset | Pulaski County retail, food, and service networks. | Staff reminders and receipt inserts work well in smaller markets. |
| Danville | Boyle County professional and retail service audiences. | Existing customer relationships are the strongest outreach base. |
| Madisonville | Hopkins County business and community networks. | Keep category and business name identical across every reminder. |
None of these twelve cities are official contest divisions. They're where Kentucky Living's readership actually clusters, and a campaign that ignores that geography is competing with one hand tied. Businesses whose following centers on a local personality rather than a storefront can also check influencer vote campaign guidance for compliant ways to activate that kind of network. And a school-linked example of the same "geography decides mobilization" logic shows up in the state's Kentucky High School Player of the Year vote.
Start from the current KentuckyLiving.com rules for the active cycle, not from what worked last year. Nothing else outranks them.
So what's actually off-limits? Fake accounts. Scripted voting. Invented sponsor claims. Calling a nominee a "winner" before Kentucky Living says so. None of that is complicated, but all of it shows up anyway when a campaign gets desperate in the final week of May.
| Campaign asset | Best use | Quality control |
|---|---|---|
| Customer email list | Nomination-round and voting-round reminders to people who already know the business. | Use the exact category and stage (nominate vs. vote) in every message. |
| In-store or office signage | Retail counters, offices, and service locations. | Swap signage the day the stage changes from nomination to voting. |
| Staff script | Simple verbal reminders during customer interactions. | Optional, low-pressure, no ask twice in one visit. |
| Social posts | Community visibility and stage reminders across the business's home city. | Rotate proof, appreciation, and deadline copy instead of reposting one graphic all month. |
| Results copy | Website, Google Business Profile, and marketing materials after publication. | Name the year, award, and category exactly as Kentucky Living published them. |
If a business wants help turning real customer and reader attention into compliant vote volume, that's a reasonable ask of a promotion service, ours included. Our own vote-buying overview spells out where that help ends and the organizer's rules begin. What no honest service will do is promise the outcome. The ballot decides that in May, and nothing before it does.
Best in Kentucky starts with open nominations in February, well before any public vote exists. Submit the business name at KentuckyLiving.com under the right category during this window; skip it and there's no May ballot to campaign for at all.
Kentucky Living organizes the ballot into about 30 groups spanning food, retail, services, health, home, and community life. The nomination locks the business into whichever group it's entered under, so match the exact current-year label instead of guessing at the broadest-sounding one.
Between the February close and the May ballot, Kentucky Living narrows nominees down to finalists. There's no public vote to cast during this stretch; the only useful action is confirming the business made the cut once the finalist ballot goes live.
The public vote runs the full month of May at KentuckyLiving.com. Supporters find the finalized category on the live ballot and vote for the nominee there, following whatever per-vote limit and identity rules Kentucky Living has posted for that specific cycle.
Kentucky Living doesn't publish a standing repeat-vote policy on this page or anywhere searchable in advance; the current May ballot is the only place that states it. Check that form each time before asking supporters to vote again, rather than assuming last year's cadence still applies.
13 answers covering legality, delivery, quality, pricing and platform specifics.
Last reviewed June 2026. Contest dates, rules and vote caps change each season — always confirm the current rules on the official contest page before you vote.
Practical guides, technical deep-dives, and anonymized case studies.60+ articles. Selection rotates.
Source UK-based Facebook contest votes with confidence — 2026 pricing tiers, geo-targeting signals, account quality benchmarks, and buyer guidance.
Read more →
IP-restricted contest voting explained — how per-IP vote limits work, what professional services do differently, subnet detection, IPv6 edge cases, and winning strategies.
Read more →
Twitter/X poll contest mechanics, vote acquisition services, safety protocols, and a proven campaign timeline — everything serious entrants need for 2026.
Read more →
Understand why Instagram removes contest votes, what triggers their integrity systems, and exact recovery steps to protect your entry and ranking in 2026.
Read more →
IPv4 vs IPv6 in contest voting — how platforms count each protocol, dual-stack edge cases, subnet-level detection, and what this means for your vote service campaign.
Read more →
Win Instagram fashion contests in 2026 — entry optimisation, fashion community vote mobilisation, cross-creator collaboration, and safe vote acquisition.
Read more →
Hi 👋 — drop your contest URL and I'll send a price quote within an hour. No card needed yet.