Sign-Up vs Open-Access Contest Votes: Full Comparison 2026
Sign-up vs open-access contest votes compared — organic conversion, service costs, delivery timelines, detection risk, and which format is harder to win competitively.
Read more →The High School on SI / SBLive statewide fan vote for the best South Carolina prep football performance of the week. Editors draw from all SCHSL classifications and SCISA private schools — up to 15 nominees per ballot — and the poll closes Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific. Vote totals are never published; only the winner is named the following week.
Disclosure: buyvotescontest.com is a vote-promotion service. This is independent, informational coverage of a public contest run by a third party; we are not affiliated with the organizer. Where our own services are relevant they are clearly labeled, and the contest's official rules always take precedence.
Most fan-vote polls show a leaderboard. Some post a percentage. A few publish the raw count after the poll closes. The South Carolina High School Football Player of the Week does none of those things. The running tally is invisible, the margin at close is never published, and the only number you ever get is zero — because there is no number. The winner's name appears in the next week's article, and that is the full public record.
That single fact changes how a campaign here should think about itself. In a poll where you can watch a percentage climb, a team can see when it is ahead and pace accordingly. Here, you are voting into a black box that closes Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific and reveals nothing until Tuesday. The only rational response is to treat every hour before Sunday night as though the race is close — because there is no data that says otherwise.
The second thing worth knowing before you do anything else: the ballot is not three names or six names. The South Carolina poll runs roughly 15 nominees every week — confirmed at exactly 15 in multiple 2025 polls. On a 15-name ballot the vote is split many ways, and a plurality of 20 to 25 percent can win. That changes the arithmetic of a campaign. You do not need to beat one rival by a wide margin; you need to hold a lead against a fractured field where no one else consolidates either.
Four winners are confirmed across the 2024–25 season, and they point in different directions on the state map.
Jamar Grissett won for Irmo in Week 0 (Aug 26, 2025 ballot). One week later, Drevon Dopson won for Irmo again — the same school, back-to-back weeks. Irmo is in Lexington County, a program that finished 2025 as 4A state champion over James F. Byrnes 35–32, and its two-week run on the SI ballot tracked that momentum in real time. The practical signal: when a school is hot and its community is already activated from playoff success, the fan-vote poll reflects it. Irmo did not win once and go dormant; its supporters stayed engaged for a second consecutive ballot.
Aiden Gibson of Woodruff won the week of Oct 20, 2025. Woodruff is a 3A program in Spartanburg County — not a school competing against Dutch Fork or Summerville on Friday nights in any bracket they share. On the ballot, it won anyway. Khalid Sherman of Loris won in December 2024; Loris is 2A. Two of the four confirmed winners came from programs at 3A or below, competing on the same ballot as 5A Division I nominees.
The table below sets out what we know for each confirmed winner:
| Winner | School | Class | Region | Poll Week |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamar Grissett | Irmo | 4A | Lexington Co. | Aug 26, 2025 |
| Drevon Dopson | Irmo | 4A | Lexington Co. | Sept 2, 2025 |
| Aiden Gibson | Woodruff | 3A | Spartanburg Co. | Oct 20, 2025 |
| Khalid Sherman | Loris | 2A | Horry Co. | Dec 14, 2024 |
What the table does not show is anyone from Dutch Fork — the program that won four consecutive 5A DI state titles from 2022 through 2025 under Tom Knotts. Kyle Henry appeared as a Dutch Fork nominee on the Oct 27 ballot, but the confirmed winner that week is Aiden Gibson of Woodruff. The state's dominant on-field program has not produced a confirmed ballot winner in this data set. That is the clearest illustration available that enrollment and recent playoff success are not reliable predictors of poll outcomes here.
South Carolina's geography shapes the fan vote in ways that are not obvious from the nominee list. The state runs roughly 220 miles from the Upstate counties bordering North Carolina down to the Lowcountry coast, and the communities along that corridor do not share media markets, alumni networks, or anything else beyond the same SCHSL classification ladder.
The Oct 27, 2025 ballot spanned that full range: Tre Segarra from James F. Byrnes in Duncan (Spartanburg County, Upstate), Connor Dantzler from James Island (Charleston County, Lowcountry), Grayson Rimpf from Camden (Kershaw County, Midlands), Trevon Williamson from Gray Collegiate Academy in West Columbia. Schools from the Greenville metro, the Columbia suburbs, the Charleston coast, and points between were on the same 15-name list the same Sunday. A campaign mobilizing votes in Horry County for a Loris nominee is drawing on a community that has essentially no overlap with one pushing for a Dutch Fork player in Irmo.
That geographic spread is worth naming plainly: there is no single media voice or alumni chain that covers the whole ballot. A school in Spartanburg County running a strong campaign does not crowd out a school in Beaufort County — they are drawing on entirely separate pools. The ballot does not reward the team with the widest statewide reach; it rewards the team whose specific community consolidates before Sunday night closes. Loris winning in December 2024 is the proof — a 2A school from Horry County, drawing on one tight coastal community, beating whatever field it faced that week.
Two separate problems decide any week here: getting your player's name into the 15, and then moving real people to the poll before Sunday night.
The Dallas / North Texas ballot posts a direct nomination email (Bob Lundeberg). The South Carolina poll's editorial contact is not as publicly listed, but the mechanism is the same: SI's South Carolina editors build the field from the weekend's results and community outreach. A complete performance summary — player, school, position, stat line, opponent and score — submitted to the editorial team by Saturday night gives the editors what they need before the ballot is assembled. A strong game that nobody flags can be passed over for one someone advocated for.
Once the ballot is live, the 15-name field means you do not need a majority — you need to hold a lead against a split. The practical job is reaching real people who will vote Sunday, not cycling one device through the weekend. Every player texting their own circle, the school's social accounts posting Saturday and again Sunday morning, an alumni group getting a reminder before the close: those are the contacts that decide it. Because the total is hidden and the close is Sunday, the last few hours matter more than the early tally you cannot see anyway.
For campaigns that need a structured edge on a 15-name ballot before Sunday closes, sports fan-poll vote support is built for exactly this kind of weekly, open, uncapped poll. The broader mechanics of recurring fan votes are covered in the how-to guide; other South Carolina contests are at /usa/south-carolina/ and the national directory at /usa/.
The ballot lives inside a weekly article at si.com/high-school/south-carolina, not on a permanent page. After the weekend's games, look for the newest "Player of the Week" post — the date in the headline is the only reliable signal, because older articles and their embedded polls stay live online. Voting in the wrong week's poll does not count toward the current race.
Each of the roughly 15 nominees is listed with the stat line that earned the nod: rushing yards, passing totals, tackles, the opponent and score. The descriptions are the only context the ballot provides, so scanning them takes less than two minutes and matters — you are choosing a name from up to 15, not two or three.
Tap or click your player in the embedded widget. No account or login is required. There is no posted per-period cap, so a supporter can return and vote again; the only hard boundary is Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific, when the poll closes.
SI announces the winner in the following week's poll article — the new ballot opens with a "Congratulations to last week's winner" line naming the player and school. There is no mid-week leaderboard and no published vote totals, so the final result is only visible once the next poll drops.
15 answers covering legality, delivery, quality, pricing and platform specifics.
Last reviewed June 2026. Contest dates, rules and vote caps change each season — always confirm the current rules on the official contest page before you vote.
Practical guides, technical deep-dives, and anonymized case studies.60+ articles. Selection rotates.
Sign-up vs open-access contest votes compared — organic conversion, service costs, delivery timelines, detection risk, and which format is harder to win competitively.
Read more →
How a community arts organization used a structured two-tranche vote strategy to win an email-verified $25,000 grant contest — with campaign decisions documented.
Read more →
How tech brands can run and win Twitter/X contests in 2026 — vote strategy, developer-community engagement, vote acquisition, and metrics that matter.
Read more →
Win Instagram fashion contests in 2026 — entry optimisation, fashion community vote mobilisation, cross-creator collaboration, and safe vote acquisition.
Read more →
Complete 2026 guide to Instagram contest votes — formats, vote acquisition, safety protocols, timing frameworks, and provider vetting in 220 words.
Read more →
Win your Facebook local business award contest in 2026 — community mobilization, network activation, and when professional vote services pay off. Act now.
Read more →
Hi 👋 — drop your contest URL and I'll send a price quote within an hour. No card needed yet.