What the Women in the Outdoors ballot is and who runs it
The 2025 Women in the Outdoors ballot is a public-vote recognition program run
by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the Milwaukee newspaper whose main site sits
at jsonline.com. The fuller organizer name attached to the project is the
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Sports Show, and the show's own page for the
initiative at jssportsshow.com/womenoutdoors/ frames it plainly: "The Milwaukee
Sports Show is proud to host women-focused initiatives that empower, connect,
and engage outdoor enthusiasts."
The market label behind the program reads Milwaukee, WI, placing it in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Balloting ran on Second Street, the platform behind the
newspaper's contest hub at jsonline.gannettcontests.com, and the ballot itself
lived at https://jsonline.gannettcontests.com/2025-Women-in-the-Outdoors. The
promotion is typed UGCVoting/UGCVotingPhoto, which marks it as a
user-generated vote in which the entries themselves carry photographs. In
subject matter this is recognition work rather than a business ranking: where
a city poll scores restaurants or contractors, this ballot honors women and
their stories from the outdoors world, with an individual photograph as the
thing supporters vote on. Nothing anywhere on the ballot asks a supporter to
pay; casting a vote is a public act open to whatever audience the form admits.
| Item | Detail |
| Program | 2025 Women in the Outdoors |
| Organizer | Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (fuller name: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Sports Show) |
| Host platform | Second Street |
| Ballot address | https://jsonline.gannettcontests.com/2025-Women-in-the-Outdoors |
| City | Milwaukee |
| State | Wisconsin |
| Format | UGCVoting/UGCVotingPhoto, a public vote over submitted photographs |
| Subject family | best-of recognition, outdoors vertical |
When the 2025 window ran and what the organizer left unpublished
Just one edition of this program is documented. Voting opened on November 14,
2025 and closed on January 11, 2026, and the ballot now stands closed. No
later edition year has been announced, and nothing published commits the
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel to another round.
Several details never appeared in print alongside the ballot either. There is
no published category roster, no published per-supporter voting frequency, no
published eligibility requirements, and no published tie-break procedure.
Anyone planning an entry strategy, a reminder schedule or an outreach push
around this ballot needs to work from whatever the live form displays when a
window is actually open, because those governing details sat with the
organizer rather than in any publicly circulating summary.
| Stage | Date | Notes |
| Voting opened | November 14, 2025 | Start of the confirmed window |
| Voting closed | January 11, 2026 | End of the confirmed window |
| Status now | Closed | No open window on this address |
| Next window | Not announced | Watch the newspaper's contest pages |
How a supporter casts a vote on this ballot
Casting a vote meant visiting the Second Street ballot at
jsonline.gannettcontests.com and working through the photo entries it
displayed. The UGCVotingPhoto format puts pictures at the center of the page:
each entry shows its photograph beside whatever identifying text its creator
supplied, and a supporter picks an entry and submits a vote for it. Nothing
about the act of voting involves payment; it is a public vote in the plainest
sense, with the ballot's own on-page instructions governing everything else
about frequency and eligibility.
With the 2025 window closed since January 11, 2026, a supporter cannot cast a
new vote on this address until the organizer posts another ballot, so the
practical move today is preparation: knowing which entry deserves support,
lining up the people who would back it, and being ready the moment a fresh
window appears. General guidance on earning support across public online
votes, including the outreach habits that transfer well between ballots of
this kind, is collected in
the guide to getting more votes online.
The takeaway for this specific program is simple: the photograph does the
persuading, and everything a supporter adds is distribution, putting the
ballot link in front of people who care about Wisconsin outdoors life.
Where this ballot sits among Wisconsin reader votes
Wisconsin carries several large reader-choice ballots, and this one differs
from every neighbour in the set. Best of the Valley covers Appleton, Best of
Madison serves Madison, Best of Milwaukee Readers' Choice ranks businesses
across the Milwaukee metro, the Eau Claire Reader's Choice Awards serve Eau
Claire, Best of the Bay covers Green Bay, and Janesville CommunityVotes runs
in Janesville. Those programs share a shape: long lists of local business and
service categories, one broad voting season, and results that function as
community endorsements for the winners.
The Women in the Outdoors ballot is narrower by design. It comes from the
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's contests operation rather than a standalone local
brand, its subject is the outdoors life of Wisconsin women, and its
photo-entry format makes individual images the unit being voted on rather
than a business name buried in a long category list. A reader who follows
several of these ballots notices the difference immediately: the city polls
reward familiar storefronts, while this one rewards a picture and the story
behind it. That contrast also changes campaign advice, because mobilizing
support for a photograph of a hunt, a catch or a trail ride calls for a
different circle of backers than a favorite diner does.
The same Second Street host also carries other promotions from the newspaper's
hub that are not votes at all, among them the WeatherPro Exteriors $55K Home
Exterior sweepstakes and the Get Kalahari'd Away Fall 2026 email giveaways,
which are drawings and entry forms rather than public tallies. Routes for each
neighbouring Wisconsin ballot are listed at the foot of this page.
Building support for an entry on this photo ballot
Support for an entry here grows the way it does on any public photo vote:
through people who see the image, respond to it and take the step of voting.
Practical levers include asking outdoor clubs, hunting and fishing networks,
church groups and coworkers to view the entry directly, posting the ballot
link where those communities already gather, and timing reminders early in a
window while attention is still fresh rather than in the closing days when
every entry is shouting at once. Because the confirmed window stretched from
mid-November into January, outreach inside any future round would land across
the holiday stretch, when Wisconsin outdoors communities are active online and
a hunting or fishing photograph travels readily through club forums and group
chats.
The organizer's position on coordinated outside help has not been published,
so the ballot's own terms are the final word for anyone weighing assistance
beyond organic outreach. For background before making any decision,
how paid vote services work lays out the
mechanics in general terms, and
where purchased votes stand legally
covers the questions worth asking. Whichever path a supporter takes, the
arithmetic of a public vote stays the same: the entry with the most accepted
votes finishes ahead, and every accepted vote has to arrive inside the
confirmed window.